A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out among future neighbours in excess of the development of a wall at a coastal web page inside a north Dublin suburb, a circumstance that has attracted nationwide notice subsequent an Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres with a proposed loved ones property at Sutton Strand, where by allegations of preparing breaches, environmental worries, and very long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into your courts. The Irish Times post about René Collier along with the Irish Moments short article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as a neighborhood disagreement has advanced into a hugely publicised authorized fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about design functions at the positioning on Dublin Highway, Sutton, where by Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and a corporation director respectively, seek to build their spouse and children property. The case has grown to be emblematic of broader disputes together Eire’s coastline, in which progress pressures collide with environmental protections and also the sensitivities of founded citizens. Based on the Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall getting manufactured by their prospective neighbours goes over and above the boundaries permitted below arranging authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, each citizens of Dublin Street, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions in their scheduling authorization by creating a wall beyond the boundaries in their web site, leading to an encroachment with a Exclusive Spot of Conservation. The SAC designation is central on the dispute, as a result regions are topic to stringent controls less than European and Irish environmental legislation. Within their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minimal encroachments could have lasting ecological effects, specifically inside a sensitive coastal ecosystem which include Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They may be in breach in their scheduling authorization, and say the wall, which is partly developed, is in the correct posture. Their authorized group has characterised the motion being an try to hold off or frustrate a lawful progress. The few accuse litigants of looking for to halt homebuilding to be able to protect their view, an allegation that has been repeated in courtroom and referenced in coverage of the situation. This accusation goes to the heart of many coastal scheduling disputes, exactly where views of the sea are the two extremely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described dramatic efforts from the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by way of ocean in storm to photograph the location, In keeping with sworn evidence referenced during the Irish Periods. In one account, Rene Collier waded by means of waistline-higher water during a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Periods, an image which includes considering that come to be emblematic of your depth from the dispute. These steps were not basically symbolic; they have been meant to Get visual proof of the wall’s situation relative to tidal lines and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website within the sea Irish Moments reported, describing how The 2 men entered the drinking water during critical weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by way of storm h2o to photograph the internet site turned The most hanging descriptions to arise from court docket reporting. The Irish Occasions post about accountant Paul Feely observed that this kind of steps were being cited to reveal the plaintiffs’ perception that the wall extended into a location afflicted by tidal motion, strengthening their argument the SAC was remaining encroached on.
The gatherings at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were covered intimately because of the nationwide press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Situations 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Situations January 27 2026 grew to become broadly searched phrases as audience sought to understand the background and implications of the situation. On that date, the High Court heard additional submissions on no matter whether interim orders really should be granted to halt building pending a full Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a key instant during the lawful timeline.
With the Main on the dispute is actually a disagreement over boundaries, setting up compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely sustain that the wall, as produced, goes beyond what was authorised and intrudes into protected land. They argue that this isn't a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by career, has been described as meticulous in his assessment of preparing documents, maps, and conditions attached on the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both pressured that their motion is enthusiastic by concern for environmental protection and adherence to organizing legislation. They reject claims that the situation is about preserving A non-public watch, insisting alternatively that it is about making sure that growth at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological restrictions. In affidavits, they've got explained their lengthy-standing link to the region and their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the opposite facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed on their own as a few simply just looking to establish a family house in accordance with the law. They deny which the wall encroaches on the Special Region of Conservation and say that all works are completed according to Skilled tips and accepted options. Their legal professionals have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the spectacular actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, which include getting into the sea during a storm, usually do not change the fundamental specifics.
The case has also lifted broader questions about how organizing disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute over construction of wall at coastal web-site happens to be a shorthand description to get a problem a large number of observers see as more and more prevalent. As sea concentrations increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the specific delineation amongst private land, community foreshore, and protected habitats has become far more contentious.
The Irish Instances short article about René Collier observed the businessman experienced Beforehand been involved in community advocacy on organizing and environmental challenges, even though not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Occasions article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how individuals from very various Skilled backgrounds can find themselves aligned in this sort of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reports spell their names, have become synonymous Using the Sutton Strand case.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site within the sea Irish Moments coverage emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded as a result of waistline-significant drinking water for the duration of a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Periods and René Collier waded via waist-higher water throughout a storm to photograph the site Irish Situations are phrases that appeared frequently in protection, reflecting equally the Actual physical actuality with the coastline along with the symbolic nature from the act. For supporters on the plaintiffs, these steps shown determination; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see as an excessive technique.
Given that the High Court proceedings continue on, the outcome stays uncertain. The courtroom ought to determine whether or not the wall as designed complies with setting up permission and no matter whether any encroachment right into a Exclusive Space of Conservation has happened. The legal arguments are complex, involving interpretation of maps, tidal details, and scheduling ailments. But the human element remains central: neighbours who ought to Dwell together with each other extended following the lawful expenditures are compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of design will work at the positioning on Dublin Street, Sutton, however the implications of the case increase past that deal with. For planners, builders, and people alike, the dispute serves like a reminder of the value of clarity in preparing permissions and sensitivity in coastal progress. In addition it underscores how speedily an area disagreement can escalate when basic issues for example environmental security and home rights are perceived to generally be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand stays a location of normal beauty and contested René Collier waded through ocean in storm to photograph the site boundaries. The wall with the centre of the dispute stands partially created, a Actual physical manifestation of unresolved authorized questions. No matter if it will eventually be altered, taken off, or done as prepared will depend on the court’s findings. Right until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will probable proceed to appear in headlines, linked indelibly to One of the more intently viewed organizing disputes in north Dublin recently.