A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out among future neighbours over the construction of the wall at a coastal web site inside a north Dublin suburb, a case which includes attracted nationwide attention subsequent an Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres with a proposed household dwelling at Sutton Strand, exactly where allegations of organizing breaches, environmental considerations, and extensive-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into the courts. The Irish Moments short article about René Collier plus the Irish Situations posting about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as an area disagreement has advanced right into a extremely publicised legal fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above design performs at the site on Dublin Street, Sutton, where by Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and a business director respectively, find to construct their family home. The case is now emblematic of wider disputes along Eire’s coastline, where progress pressures collide with environmental protections plus the sensitivities of recognized residents. In accordance with the Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall being created by their possible neighbours goes beyond the boundaries permitted under arranging permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, each residents of Dublin Street, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases of their arranging authorization by developing a wall over and above the boundaries in their website, bringing about an encroachment on a Exclusive Space of Conservation. The SAC designation is central towards the dispute, as a result places are subject matter to strict controls less than European and Irish environmental regulation. Within their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minor encroachments could have Long lasting ecological consequences, significantly inside of a sensitive coastal setting which include Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They can be in breach of their organizing authorization, and say the wall, and that is partially built, is in the right posture. Their lawful crew has characterised the action as an try to delay or frustrate a lawful growth. The pair accuse litigants of seeking to halt homebuilding to be able to protect their look at, an allegation that's been recurring in court docket and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the heart of many coastal organizing disputes, wherever views of The ocean are the two very prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described dramatic initiatives through the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded as a result of ocean in storm to photograph the site, As outlined by sworn proof referenced from the Irish Moments. In a single account, Rene Collier waded via waist-higher h2o all through a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Periods, a picture which includes due to the fact develop into emblematic on the intensity with the dispute. These actions weren't simply symbolic; they were meant to Collect Visible evidence with the wall’s place relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site through the sea Irish Occasions claimed, describing how the two Adult men entered the water through extreme climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading via storm drinking water to photograph the site grew to become one of the most hanging descriptions to arise from court docket reporting. The Irish Instances short article about accountant Paul Feely mentioned that these steps were cited to exhibit the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall prolonged into an area impacted by tidal movement, strengthening their argument the SAC was remaining encroached on.
The occasions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 have been included intimately by the nationwide press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Instances 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Periods January 27 2026 turned greatly searched phrases as audience sought to be familiar with the background and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court read further more submissions on regardless of whether interim orders must be granted to halt development pending a complete hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a crucial second within the legal timeline.
In the Main of your dispute is usually a disagreement around boundaries, scheduling compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely manage the wall, as created, goes over and above what was authorized and intrudes into protected land. They argue that it's not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by job, has become referred to as meticulous in his examination of scheduling paperwork, maps, and circumstances hooked up to your permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both pressured that their action is determined by concern for environmental security and adherence to arranging law. They reject statements that the case is René Collier waded through waist-high water during a storm to photograph the site Irish Times about preserving A personal look at, insisting rather that it's about ensuring that enhancement at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological restrictions. In affidavits, they've explained their lengthy-standing link to the region and their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the other side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed by themselves as a couple just endeavoring to develop a spouse and children house in accordance Along with the law. They deny that the wall encroaches on the Distinctive Region of Conservation and say that each one will work happen to be completed based upon Experienced guidance and accredited options. Their legal professionals have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the extraordinary steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, including entering the sea throughout a storm, usually do not alter the underlying details.
The case has also raised broader questions on how planning disputes are fixed in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute around design of wall at coastal web page happens to be a shorthand description for a situation that many observers see as increasingly common. As sea concentrations increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation in between private land, general public foreshore, and protected habitats is starting to become much more contentious.
The Irish Situations posting about René Collier observed that the businessman experienced Formerly been involved in area advocacy on arranging and environmental concerns, though not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Instances article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how persons from really different Qualified backgrounds can find by themselves aligned in this kind of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some experiences spell their names, are becoming synonymous with the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site through the sea Irish Times coverage emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded through waistline-significant water for the duration of a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Instances and René Collier waded by midsection-higher drinking water all through a storm to photograph the site Irish Instances are phrases that appeared regularly in protection, reflecting both the Actual physical actuality of your coastline along with the symbolic character of the act. For supporters in the plaintiffs, these actions shown motivation; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see being an abnormal solution.
Given that the High Court proceedings proceed, the end result remains uncertain. The court docket have to establish if the wall as created complies with arranging permission and no matter if any encroachment into a Particular Location of Conservation has occurred. The legal arguments are elaborate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal details, and scheduling ailments. Still the human factor remains central: neighbours who must Are living along with each other extensive following the legal prices are actually paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than design performs at the website on Dublin Highway, Sutton, even so the implications of the case prolong past that handle. For planners, developers, and people alike, the dispute serves for a reminder of the significance of clarity in organizing permissions and sensitivity in coastal advancement. In addition, it underscores how promptly an area disagreement can escalate when essential problems which include environmental safety and residence rights are perceived to become at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand remains an area of natural splendor and contested boundaries. The wall at the centre in the dispute stands partially designed, a Actual physical manifestation of unresolved legal queries. Irrespective of whether it's going to in the long run be altered, eradicated, or completed as planned will depend upon the court docket’s results. Right until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will very likely continue on to seem in headlines, joined indelibly to The most intently watched setting up disputes in north Dublin in recent years.